Bibliography

1. Simpson, H.M., Mayhew, D.R., and Beirness, D J. 1996.
Dealing With the Hard Core Drinking Driver.
The Traffic Injury Research Foundation, Ottawa, Canada.
back
2. Wiliszowski, C., Murphy, P., and Lacey, J. 1996.
Determine Reasons for Repeat Drinking and Driving.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
DOT HS 808 401.
back
3. National Highway Traffic Safety Admistration/Fatality
Analysis Reporting System. 1997.
Alcohol Methodology File.
back
4. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration/Fatality
Analysis Reporting System. 1997.
Alcohol Empirical File.
back
5. Friedman, J., Harrington, C., and Higgins, D. 1995.
Reconvicted Drinking Driver Study.
New York State Department of Motor Vehicles.
AL 90-004.
back
6. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. 1996.
A Guide to Sentencing DUI Offenders.
NHTSA and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
DOT HS 808-365.
back
7. DWI Process and Data Standards Committee of the
State of New Mexico. 1996.
New Mexico DWI Process Improvement Management Plan.
back
8. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 1997.
Driving While Intoxicated Tracking Systems. Volume I: Design & Operation.
DOT HS 808-520.
back
9. Transportation Research Board. 1995.
Strategies for Dealing with the Persistent Drinking Driver,
Transportation Research Circular No. 437.
Washington, D.C. National Research Council
back
10. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. August 1996.
Alcohol Q&A: Deterrence & Enforcement.
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
back
10a. American Prosecutors Research Institute. 1997.
PBT Laws: Research Summary.
National Traffic Law Center. Alexandria, Virginia.
back
11. Voas, R.B., Holder, H.D., and Gruenewald, PJ. 1997.
The effect of drinking and driving interventions on alcohol-involved
traffic crashes within a comprehensive community trial,

Addiction. Supplement 2, S221B286
back
12. Leaf, WA., and Preusser, D.F. March 1996.
Effectiveness of Passive Alcohol Sensors.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
DOT HS 808 381.
back
13. Martin, S.E., and Preusser, D.F. 1995.
Enforcement strategies for the persistent drinking driver,
Strategies for Dealing with the Persistent Drinking Driver,
Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Circular No. 437.
Washington, D.C. National Research Council: 38-42.
back
14. Ohio State Highway Patrol, 240 Parsons Ave.,
Columbus, Ohio 48215.
back
15. DeYoung, DJ. 1990.
Development, Implementation and Evaluation of a Pilot Project to
Better Control Disqualified Drivers.

California Office of Traffic Safety, Sacramento, California.
CAL-DMV- RSS-9O129.
back
16. Voas, R.B. 1995.
Can administrative programs control the persistent drinking driver?
Strategies for Dealing with the Persistent Drinking Driver,
Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Circular No. 437.
Washington, D.C. National Research Council: 52-56.
back
17. Auburn University Department of Computer Science R Engineering. 1991.
The Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Assessment Programs in
Alabama and El Cajon, California.

Auburn University, Alabama.
back
18. Foley, D. Sept./Oct. 1997.
Deferred prosecution: one state’s controversial approach to
misdemeanor impaired driving charges,

Impaired Driving Update.
Civic Research Institute, Inc., Kingston, New Jersey.
back
19. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration. 1990.
Impact of Court Monitoring on DWI Adjudication.
DOT HS 807 678.
back
20. Ross, H.L. 1992.
Are DWI sanc-tions effective?
Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, vol. 8, no. 1.
UCLA Brain Information Service/Brain Research Institute,
Los Angeles, California: 61-69.
back
21. Peck, R.C., Wilson, R. J., and Sutton, L. 1995.
Driver license strategies for controlling the persistent DUI offender,
Strategies for Dealing with the intent Drinking Driver.
Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Circular No. 437.
Washington, D.C. National Research Council: 48-49.
back
22. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. October 1996.
State Legislative Fact Sheet.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
back
23. De Young, D J. 1995.
An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of California Drinking Driver Programs.
Report to the Legislature of the State of California.
State of California Department of Motor Vehicles.
Sacramento, California.
back
24. Davies, B.T. 1996.
Evaluation of Administrative License Revocation as a DWI Countermeasure.
Texas Transportation Institute and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
The Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas.
back
25. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. August 1996.
Alcohol Q&A: Administrative License Suspension.
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
back
26. Knowbel, K.Y., and Ross, H.L. 1996.
Effects of Administrative License Revocation on Employment.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.
back
27. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 1991.
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Administrative License Suspensions.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
DOT HS 807 689.
back
28. Nichols, J.L., and Ross, H.L. 1990.
The effectiveness of legal sanctions in dealing with drinking drivers,
Alcohol, Drugs and Driving. vol 6, no. 2: 33-60.
back
29. Popkin, C.L., and Wells-Parker, E. 1994.
A research agenda for the specific deterrence of DWI, J
Traffic Med. vol. 2, no. 1: 1-14.
back
30. Jones, R.K., Wiliszowski, C.H., and Lacey, J.H. 1996.
Evaluation of Alternative Programs for Repeat DWI Offenders.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
Washington, D.C. DOT HS 808 493.
back
31. Shinar, D., and Compton, R.P. 1995.
Victim impact panels: their impact on DWI recidivism,
Alcohol, Drugs and Driving. vol. 11, no. 1: 73-87.
back
32. Russell, A. 1995.
Citizen activists’ assessments of the DUI problem,
public attitudes, and selected responses to the drinking driver,

Strategies for Dealing with the Persistent Drinking Driver.
Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Circular No. 487.
Washington, D.C. National Research Council: 69-71.
back
33. Beck, K.H., Rauch, WJ., and Baker, EW 1997.
The sects of Alcohol Ignition Interlock License Restrictions
on Multiple Alcohol Offenders: A Randomized Trial in Maryland.

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety,
Arlington, Virginia.
back
34. Tippetts, A. S., and Voas, R.B. 1996.
The Effectiveness of the West Virginia Interlock Program.
The Pacific Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
back
35. Voas, R.B., Tippetts, A.S., and Taylor, E. 1996.
The Effect of Vehicle Impoundment and Immobilization
on Driving Offenses of Suspended and Repeat DWI Drivers.

40th annual proceed-ings of the Association for the
Advancement of Automotive Medicine,
Vancouver, British Columbia.
back
36. Crosby, I.B. 1995.
Wetland’s Asset Forfeiture Program: The Effectiveness of
Vehicle Secure in Reducing Rearrest Among “Problem” Drunk Drivers.

A joint project by Reed College Public Policy Workshop
and the City of Portland Bureau of Police Asset Forfeiture Unit.
back
37. Kuhl, K. July/August 1997.
A profile of Wisconsin’s multiple offender program: intensive
education for the nonaddicted offender,

Impaired Driving Update.
Civic Research Institute, Inc., Kingston, New Jersey.
back
38. Jackson, R.L. 1992.
DUI and California’s drinking driver pro-gram.
In Proceedings of the California Drinking and Driving
Prevention Symposium, Nov. 15-17.
Ontario, California.
back
39. Wells-Parker, E., Bengert-Drowns, R., McMillen, R., and Williams, M. 1995.
Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions
with drink/drive offenders,

Addiction, 90: 907-926....
back
40. Hedlund, J. 1995.
Commentaries: Comments on Wells-Parker et al’s article
"Final results from a meta-analysis of remedial interventions
with drink/drive offenders,”

Addiction. 90: 1593-1594
back
41. Mann, R.E., Anglin, L., Wilkins, K., Vingilis, E.R.,
Macdonald, S., and Sheu, W.-J. 1994.
Rehabilitation for convicted drinking drivers
(second offenders):effects on mortality,

Journal of Studies on Alcohol.
Addiction Research Foundation,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
55, 372-374.
back

Home | State Profiles | State Legislation | Community Forums