|
Vehicle Registration Cancellation
and License Plate Seizure |
|
This sanction is used as an alternative to vehicle
impoundment and is intended to result in vehicle immobilization. The plate
can be administratively confiscated by a police officer during a DWI arrest,
and the registration of the vehicle used in the offense may be revoked.
For more information on immobilization, see the Vehicle
Immobilization section.
Administrative plate seizure is inexpensive and efficient. At the time of
arrest, the police remove the plates and the state invalidates the vehicle's
registration. In some states, a grace period allows the offender up to 15
days to turn in the plates themselves or face additional penalties. When
there are family members who are dependent on the car, special tags can
alert police to potential violators. Since the license plate is the property
of the state, no infringement of property rights is in question. Three states
— Iowa, Minnesota, and Ohio — issue special license plates to permit the
use of the vehicle by the family members of convicted DWI offenders (NHTSA
State Legislative Fact Sheet, Jan. 2001).
Minnesota has administrative license plate impoundment. People arrested
for drunk driving who have a previous offense within 10 years or who have
a BAC of .20 or higher will have their license plates impounded and destroyed.
Replacement plates are issued only when the license revocation order has
been rescinded after the mandatory minimum impoundment period.
In some cases, special license plates can be substituted. These plates contain
a special sequence of letters for drunk driving offenders. Minnesota law
also allows an officer to stop at any time a vehicle bearing the special
license plates to check the status of the driver’s license.
In 2000, Minnesota passed a law making it a separate crime for an offender
subject to plate impoundment order to drive a vehicle without a special
plate or for a transferee of the vehicle to allow the previously registered
owner to drive during the impoundment period. The maximum penalty for violation
of this law is a fine of $1000 and 90 days in jail. |
|
Where Are Registration Cancellation
and License Plate Seizure Used? |
In 19 states and the District of Columbia, vehicle
registration is withdrawn upon conviction of a DWI offense or a driving-while-suspended
offense that originated from a DWI charge, according to the National Hardcore
Drunk Driver Project Survey. In Georgia, offenders may be subject to plate
seizure on a third conviction. In Minnesota, police can seize plates of
drivers who have had three or more DWIs within a five-year period. They
may also confiscate the plates of any other vehicles owned by the same person.
In Ohio and Minnesota, violators are required to turn in their plates but
could apply for "family plates" that allow another family member to use
the vehicle (Voas and DeYoung 2002). |
|
How Effective Are Registration
Cancellation and License Plate Seizure? |
Studies show administrative-based plate seizure
for hardcore drunk drivers is a low-cost and effective procedure that can
significantly reduce recidivism. Minnesota’s administrative-based plate
impoundment program showed a 50 percent decrease in recidivism over a two-year
period when compared with DWI violators who did not experience impoundment.
In general, however, license plate seizure laws are poorly enforced. A study
of Minnesota offers a good comparison of judicial vs. administrative application
of license plate seizures. During the 29 months when the plate seizure law
was managed through the judicial system, only 465 — or 6 percent — of the
7,698 eligible, third-time offenders had their license plates impounded.
During the 21 months after the law was applied administratively in 1991,
3,136 — or 68 percent — of the 4,593 third-time DWI offenders had vehicle
plates impounded. |
|
Where to Go for More Information
on Vehicle Registration Cancellation and Plate Seizure |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
April 2002. State Legislative Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration. |
Jones, R.K, and Lacey, J.H. 2001. Alcohol and Highway Safety 2001: A
review of the state of knowledge. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration.
|
Voas, R.B., and DeYoung, D.J. 2002. Vehicle action: effective policy for
controlling drunk and other high risk drivers? Accident Analysis and
Prevention 34: 263–270.
|